it is not a yam
Aug. 29th, 2004 04:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
oiranI had this nice, long post typed up in the stupid update window and then my browser just...closed. Went away. The web-based update is not now, nor has it ever been, my friend.
I would wager that I am the only person I know who has a sprouted sweet potato sitting on her desk. The delicate, tender sprouts tremble in the breeze from the vent overhead. I found it in the back of a pantry cupboard and I know it's garbage, but it was just too strange and pretty to throw out without memorializing it in some way.
The long story I typed up about a breakdown of our truck in the middle of nowhere 10 years ago, hostile cowboys and Mexican migrant workers, a vivid dress, and the only explanation for including the story that I could come up with (I think I was the sweet potato in that instance) will just have to be imagined, since I haven't the will to retype it.
After her visit,![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
gothphyle left me with a book, The Erotic Edge: Erotica for Couples, as compiled by Lonnie Barbach, PhD. Please note, Alee did not recommend this book. I have read half of the stories and I have yet to find anything "erotic." I have, however, read many euphemistic references to nether regions and a great deal of stilted dialogue. In the foreword, the editor describes the reader's dilemma when it comes to erotic writings as being between "decency" and "lusty sexuality." Oh, man. Decency.
It's nearly entirely het, half written by men and half by women. None of them are good writers, so the editor's suggestion that we play a little game by trying to figure out whether a man or a woman wrote a given story is rendered uncompelling by the lack of story quality. Once again, I learn that women like reading about intimacy and hate any overtones of violence or crudity (it's because we're decent, yo!) Men, what with their visual fixation, like to write and read about pink parts squooshing together with an explicitness that may abrade a woman's tender sensibilities. For instance, as a woman, I should find "pink parts" and "abrade" together in a sentence distastefully violent.
The editor is supposed to be some sort of sexpert, though I'm not exactly sure what her credentials are. She does admit to a bias when it came to choosing stories for this volume, but she presents those same biases as facts when describing the differences between men's and women's interests and preferences.
In order for an "emotional" scene to resonate with me instead of just seeming hysterical and trite, there needs to be character development. Someone placing "his hardness" against "her moist sex" while they call each other darling is not really what I'd call emotional writing.
*has tantrum re: published erotica*
~~~
Went to get a cup of coffee at coffeeshop (Coffee Rachel was not there). Saw an acquaintance I haven't seen in months. She looked at me, shocked, and said, "Are you shrinking?"
Yay!
~~~
back to work.
p.s. It is okay to laugh at the potato glamour shot.
I would wager that I am the only person I know who has a sprouted sweet potato sitting on her desk. The delicate, tender sprouts tremble in the breeze from the vent overhead. I found it in the back of a pantry cupboard and I know it's garbage, but it was just too strange and pretty to throw out without memorializing it in some way.
The long story I typed up about a breakdown of our truck in the middle of nowhere 10 years ago, hostile cowboys and Mexican migrant workers, a vivid dress, and the only explanation for including the story that I could come up with (I think I was the sweet potato in that instance) will just have to be imagined, since I haven't the will to retype it.
After her visit,
gothphyle left me with a book, The Erotic Edge: Erotica for Couples, as compiled by Lonnie Barbach, PhD. Please note, Alee did not recommend this book. I have read half of the stories and I have yet to find anything "erotic." I have, however, read many euphemistic references to nether regions and a great deal of stilted dialogue. In the foreword, the editor describes the reader's dilemma when it comes to erotic writings as being between "decency" and "lusty sexuality." Oh, man. Decency.It's nearly entirely het, half written by men and half by women. None of them are good writers, so the editor's suggestion that we play a little game by trying to figure out whether a man or a woman wrote a given story is rendered uncompelling by the lack of story quality. Once again, I learn that women like reading about intimacy and hate any overtones of violence or crudity (it's because we're decent, yo!) Men, what with their visual fixation, like to write and read about pink parts squooshing together with an explicitness that may abrade a woman's tender sensibilities. For instance, as a woman, I should find "pink parts" and "abrade" together in a sentence distastefully violent.
The editor is supposed to be some sort of sexpert, though I'm not exactly sure what her credentials are. She does admit to a bias when it came to choosing stories for this volume, but she presents those same biases as facts when describing the differences between men's and women's interests and preferences.
In order for an "emotional" scene to resonate with me instead of just seeming hysterical and trite, there needs to be character development. Someone placing "his hardness" against "her moist sex" while they call each other darling is not really what I'd call emotional writing.
*has tantrum re: published erotica*
~~~
Went to get a cup of coffee at coffeeshop (Coffee Rachel was not there). Saw an acquaintance I haven't seen in months. She looked at me, shocked, and said, "Are you shrinking?"
Yay!
~~~
back to work.
p.s. It is okay to laugh at the potato glamour shot.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:06 pm (UTC)That yam is *crying* out for your nurturing fingers!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:09 pm (UTC)women like reading about intimacy and hate any overtones of violence or crudity
So very true.
*goes back to writing non-con pr0n which I write for myself, as no one else is interested in reading it*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:15 pm (UTC)You are correct - no one else will want to read it, except maybe some men. I hear they are fond of four-letter words.
Why don't you write something DECENT for a change?
*prays*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:34 pm (UTC)On my end, I spent four hours this afternoon on spontaneous closet purging. Have 3 tall kitchen garbage bags full of clothes for Goodwill. Thankfully, I then *did* start work on my fic, and have been very productive* over the last couple hours.
*My word count has only grown by 112 words, but the sex appeal has increased by about 200%. This is how I write.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:49 pm (UTC)I actually have a story I really like that I might send along with the challenge one, too. It will be universally reviled, however, as it is second person. LEX second person.
*hammers nails into ears*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:51 pm (UTC)Oh. And 112 words hotter is definitely more than the sum of its parts. It's not 112 words of tax code, after all.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:54 pm (UTC)Hmm...coffee sounds like a good idea.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:32 pm (UTC)I honestly wonder where this shit about "women do not like dirty language and sex without meaningful love, in stories" comes from. I used to think that perhaps I was a pervert until I discovered all these other chicks who like filthy talk, and, you know, cocks and cunts, not hardnesses and moist pink openings.
I have a book about fantasies and your star signs, and while the language is restrained, there are plenty of female fantasies about random loveless sex with strangers. In fact, about two thirds of them would be. Strange, perverted women.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 03:53 pm (UTC)Random, loveless sex with strangers gets a bad rap.
Moist, pink openings reminds me of my long-gone cat, Fred, licking his very pink butt clean. So not sexy.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 04:23 pm (UTC)And yay for shrinking! I think I'm doing a little bit of that myself, but am so fat it's difficult to really tell. Can see a bit of it in my face, and I know my jeans are too big, but there are many, many, MANY pounds to go.
*peppers you with non-cayenne smooches*
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 04:54 pm (UTC)Hot pink stems on purple velvet! What's not to love?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-29 11:44 pm (UTC)*failed*
*is a failure*
also: what would this PhD holding doctor person say about the fact that my favorite sex scenes are usually angry!sex?